Scotland Yard: ‘Errors’ in Met’s VIP paedophile probe Operation Midland

Scotland Yard’s investigation into VIP paedophile allegations had ‘numerous errors’, review finds.

The investigation cost £2.5million and didn’t lead to a single arrest.

It found that too much reliance was put on a single witness – a man in his 40s called Nick.

One of the people put under suspicion was Lord Brittan who died of cancer in January 2015 without being told that police had concluded four months earlier that he had been cleared of any wrongdoing.

The 493-page report found that there were 43 failings in the conduct of the investigation, dubbed Operation Midland, which ended in March.

The report found the principle errors were:

• To believe the complainant Nick was a credible person for too long
• To say publicly that the allegations were credible and true
• To obtain search warrants with flawed and incomplete information
• Not to have closed the investigation sooner

In a statement, commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe accepted accountability for the failures on behalf of the Metropolitan Police.

He said: ‘It is a matter of professional and personal dismay that the suspects in the investigation were pursued for so long when it could have been concluded much earlier.

‘I am today issuing a public apology to Lord Bramall, Lady Brittan and Harvey Proctor for the intrusion into their homes and the impact of Operation Midland on their lives.

‘The public identification of suspects compounded the harm of our investigative failures.’

As key parts of the report were published, Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe said he ‘fully recognised’ that D-Day veteran Lord Bramall, former Tory MP Harvey Proctor and the late former Home Secretary Lord Brittan were all ‘innocent of the offences of which they were accused’.

He apologised to Lord Bramall, Mr Proctor and Lord Brittan’s widow for ‘the impact of Operation Midland on their lives’.

Sir Richard’s damning review found 43 failings in Operation Midland, including believing the complainant, a man known as ‘Nick’, for too long; one officer announcing that his claims were ‘credible and true’; and applying for search warrants with flawed information.

The former judge said: ‘The principal cause of the many failures in this investigation was poor judgment and a failure to accurately evaluate known facts and to react to them. A major contributing factor was the culture that ‘victims’ must be believed.’

In a letter to Sir Bernard introducing the report, Sir Richard said the principal cause of mistakes in Operation Midland was the decision to search several premises, thereby risking the names of the householders being published.

He wrote: ‘The decision to search those premises was a grave error of judgment when the several inconsistencies in Nick’s interviews are carefully analysed as they should have been prior to the searches.’

He concluded that the investigation could have been carried out speedily and without those named by Nick learning of it.

Sir Richard said in the letter that there is an ‘unjustifiable imbalance’ between the scrutiny of complainants and suspects, which was highlighted in Operation Midland.

He said: ‘The police inspected every piece of paper and recording equipment in the homes of Lord Bramall, Lady Brittan and Mr Proctor, including letters of commiseration and Golden Wedding invitations.’

Lord Bramall and Mr Proctor were accused of the gravest of crimes and then left in a state of limbo, Sir Richard said, while Nick was contacted on a regular basis and given ‘chapter and verse’ on the progress of the investigation.

He said much work must be done to improve the police relationship with suspects.

‘I have observed the crushing effect that a prolonged investigation can have on innocent suspects and their families,’ he wrote.

Scotland Yard said that as a result of the review another force, Northumbria, would investigate a claim that ‘a complainant’ had attempted to pervert the course of justice.

Five officers have also been referred to police watchdog the Independent Police Complaints Commission over potential breaches in professional standards linked to Operation Midland.

Deputy chair Rachel Cerfontyne said: ‘We were advised earlier today that the Metropolitan Police is to refer the conduct of five officers, ranging in rank from sergeant to deputy assistant commissioner, to the IPCC in relation to Operation Midland.

‘We understand the conduct of a deputy assistant commissioner will also be referred to the IPCC regarding a different operation.

‘We have assembled an assessment team to analyse relevant documentation to be supplied by the force, and provide me with a recommendation. Once I receive that recommendation, I will decide whether there will be an investigation and, if so, what form that investigation will take. I am aware of the significant public interest in these matters and I will announce that decision once I have made it and all concerned parties have been notified.

‘We have not received any complaints from individuals who may feel they were adversely affected by the actions of officers involved in Operation Midland but, as in all cases, were such complaints to be referred to the IPCC they would be given due consideration.’

Met Deputy Commissioner Steve Rodhouse said: ‘I do not believe that I, or indeed any officer within Operation Midland, have committed any misconduct. While it is right that lessons should be learned from Operation Midland I want to emphasise that my colleagues and I investigated the allegations made with the best of intentions. Indeed I am grateful that Sir Richard himself recorded that the Operation Midland officers ‘conducted this investigation in a conscientious manner and with propriety and honesty’.

‘If a further investigation is required then I will, of course, continue fully to co-operate with it.’