Anders Behring Breivik: Norway Mass killer claimed human rights violation

0
845
Anders Behring Breivik: Norway Mass killer claimed human rights violation
Anders Behring Breivik: Norway Mass killer claimed human rights violation
Anders Behring Breivik: Norway Mass killer claimed human rights violation
Anders Behring Breivik: Norway Mass killer claimed human rights violation

Anders Behring Breivik isn’t being kept in inhuman conditions after all.

An appeals court has ruled Norway did not violate mass murderer Anders Breivik’s human rights by being held in isolation.

Breivik, an anti-Islam neo-Nazi, killed 77 people in Norway in July 2011. He killed eight people using a bomb, before gunning down 69 people at a youth meeting of the then-ruling Labour Party.

“The Borgarting Court of Appeal has determined that Anders Behring Breivik is not, and has not been, subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment,” the court said in a statement.

READ  Millionaire Princess Found Sleeping On Milan Streets

“Breivik is not, and has not, been subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment,” it said.

The 38-year-old right-wing extremist will file an appeal against the verdict to Norway’s highest court, the supreme court, his lawyer Oystein Storrvik announced immediately after the ruling was published.

READ  Girl Scouts hit by truck remembered at emotional vigil

In April 2016, an Oslo district court stunned survivors and families of the victims when it found the Norwegian state guilty of treating Breivik “inhumanely” and in “degrading” fashion, in breach of article 3 of the European convention on human rights.

Strict conditions for Breivik, who has no contact with other inmates and has not repented for the attacks, were justified because there was a “high risk” that he would use violence in future and because other prisoners might attack him, it said.

READ  COVID-19 Updates: Johnson to give evidence to liaison committee

Survivors and relatives of the 77 dead welcomed the verdict after denouncing last year’s ruling as a perversion of a Convention that starts with the sentence “everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law”.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.